Henry Bergson's Philosophical Thought - As we know, Henry Bergson was one of the foremost French philosophers of his time. The ideas he initiated gave a huge influence on the development of Philosophical and Psychological thinking. From the many philosophical thoughts of Henry Bergson, on this occasion the explanation will focus more on one of his thoughts, Duree and Freedom.
Henry Bergson's philosophical thinking contradicts direct experience, my experience as me. In this case, Bergson's greatest discovery is what he called Duree (in English: Duration). According to Bergson, we must be able to distinguish 2 kinds of time.
Usually our understanding of time is dominated by an understanding of space. Time is understood based on space. If so, time is likened to an infinite line consisting of dots and all those points are located one outside the other. Time is considered quantitative. In other words, time can be divided and measured. At least that time is understood and studied by science. This understanding is usually used according to the objective-physical aspects.
In French, the explanation of time as above is called Bergson as 'Temps' (which is indeed used to refer to the word 'time' in France). As for time in a more fundamental sense, Bergson calls it the word 'Duree' or duration or duration. The point is the time we experience directly. This understanding is used according to psychological-subjective objects.
Well, consciousness itself is duree so it is impossible to describe it quantitatively. It is impossible to separate between one consciousness with or from another situation around that awareness. According to Henry Bergson's philosophical thinking, all the difficulties in Psychological or Philosophical thinking stem from this. Namely duree (duration) which is qualitative in nature is translated based on quantitative things, namely space and time. Events in consciousness are treated as psychic events while psychic life is explained mechanically.
When we realize that duree is the essence of consciousness, we have the key to achieving freedom. Freedom cannot be proven, nor is it the result of analysis. Freedom can only be experienced. This is because consciousness is a movement, a continuous development of transition.
If indeed spontaneity does not exist, then our actions cannot be called free but come from either automatism or mechanism. In other words, most humans are not free. In this case, determinism also contains elements of truth.
At least that's a little review of Henry Bergson's philosophical thinking about Duree and Freedom. In this case, I am still learning so if there is something wrong, please correct it. Thank you, hope it's useful.
Philosophical Thought of Henry Bergson: Duree (Duration) and Freedom
In his first book, entitled "Essays on Data that Are Directly Presented to Consciousness", Henry Bergson talks about freedom concerning Philosophy and Psychology. The thinking of Henry Bergson is actually emphasizing the criticism of determinism. Determinism is intended at a view that considers humans to be totally determined or determined by certain factors. In other words, humans do not have absolute freedom.Henry Bergson's philosophical thinking contradicts direct experience, my experience as me. In this case, Bergson's greatest discovery is what he called Duree (in English: Duration). According to Bergson, we must be able to distinguish 2 kinds of time.
Usually our understanding of time is dominated by an understanding of space. Time is understood based on space. If so, time is likened to an infinite line consisting of dots and all those points are located one outside the other. Time is considered quantitative. In other words, time can be divided and measured. At least that time is understood and studied by science. This understanding is usually used according to the objective-physical aspects.
"For a simpler example, namely the time set in the form of seconds, minutes, hours, days, and so on"
In French, the explanation of time as above is called Bergson as 'Temps' (which is indeed used to refer to the word 'time' in France). As for time in a more fundamental sense, Bergson calls it the word 'Duree' or duration or duration. The point is the time we experience directly. This understanding is used according to psychological-subjective objects.
"For example, time that has no 'physical' form. For example, the A and B are waiting for C. Both A and B are waiting for C at the same time. After the C arrived, according to the A he waited a long time. While the B does not feel waiting for the long arrival of C.
Further Understanding Duree, An Unlimited Time
If you already understand the explanation of Henry Bergson's thoughts above, then let us go into a deeper discussion. From the example above, it can be concluded that for Bergson, duree is not quantitative. In essence duree is continuity, always flows continuously undivided.Well, consciousness itself is duree so it is impossible to describe it quantitatively. It is impossible to separate between one consciousness with or from another situation around that awareness. According to Henry Bergson's philosophical thinking, all the difficulties in Psychological or Philosophical thinking stem from this. Namely duree (duration) which is qualitative in nature is translated based on quantitative things, namely space and time. Events in consciousness are treated as psychic events while psychic life is explained mechanically.
When we realize that duree is the essence of consciousness, we have the key to achieving freedom. Freedom cannot be proven, nor is it the result of analysis. Freedom can only be experienced. This is because consciousness is a movement, a continuous development of transition.
Bergson said: "We are free, if our actions emanate from our entire personality, if our deeds express our personality, if between our deeds and personalities there is a difficult predetermined resemblance; similarities that sometimes exist also between artists and his work. "
If indeed spontaneity does not exist, then our actions cannot be called free but come from either automatism or mechanism. In other words, most humans are not free. In this case, determinism also contains elements of truth.
At least that's a little review of Henry Bergson's philosophical thinking about Duree and Freedom. In this case, I am still learning so if there is something wrong, please correct it. Thank you, hope it's useful.



